Comments on: Open source science http://davec.org/2010/02/open-source-science/ Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:57:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Steve Easterbrook http://davec.org/2010/02/open-source-science/comment-page-1/#comment-2092 Steve Easterbrook Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:48:58 +0000 http://davec.org/?p=1009#comment-2092 Dave, Thanks for writing that - it's a very nice rebuttal of Ince's letter. I wrote to the Guardian in response to the Ince piece, but they never published my letter. It's here: http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?p=1388 I like the tone of your rebuttal better! Dave,
Thanks for writing that – it’s a very nice rebuttal of Ince’s letter. I wrote to the Guardian in response to the Ince piece, but they never published my letter. It’s here:
http://www.easterbrook.ca/steve/?p=1388

I like the tone of your rebuttal better!

]]> By: Climate Science and Software Quality | Serendipity http://davec.org/2010/02/open-source-science/comment-page-1/#comment-2091 Climate Science and Software Quality | Serendipity Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:48:42 +0000 http://davec.org/?p=1009#comment-2091 [...] Update: The Guardian never published my letter, but I did find a few other rebuttals to Ince’s article in various blogs. Davec’s is my favourite! [...] [...] Update: The Guardian never published my letter, but I did find a few other rebuttals to Ince’s article in various blogs. Davec’s is my favourite! [...]

]]>