Dave’s Archives

Entries categorised as 'Uncategorized'

Optus pestus

January 31st, 2010 · Comments Off

Optus's website is a work of malevolent genius. It attacks one's psyche on every level, from the stupefyingly inane animals to the incomprehensible maze of links to the bizarre concoctions that are the descriptions of the Optus service itself.

It is the latter that most effectively tests my composure. The concept of "pre-paid" is theoretically quite straightforward - one hands money to the mobile carrier, which accordingly provides services to the value of whatever you paid. Now, take the Optus pre-paid offers (which I've done, perhaps unfortunately).

In fact, take all seven of them. Why seven? You can access any Optus mobile service with any offer, so this has nothing to do with paying for different services. Moreover, for each "offer" there are five levels of payment ($30, $40, $50, $70 and $100). Why just five? The actual cost of Optus's services are measured in cents, so why can't I pay $20 and receive $20 worth of service? (You can, in fact, but that's merely part of a whole other ad hoc set of offers.)

The reason there are seven "offers" is that you get other stuff. Not other services, just... free stuff (the kind of free stuff that you pay for). For each of the thirty five ways of paying for "pre-paid" (38 if you include the $10, $15 and $20 offers), you get different types and amounts free stuff. These are all explained in detail on the website. Each payment option has "value", "included value" and "bonus", which are apparently all different, but these are just headings. What you actually get is some combination of the following: "MyCredit", "MyBonus", "Pre-Paid Messaging Money", "Pre-Paid Money", "RevUp Bonus", "FreeCall Minutes", "MyTime Minutes", "PowerUp Money", "MyTime Money", "MyData" and a range of ad hoc deals.

A few points on this appalling spectacle. First, from a rather well-hidden document, "MyBonus" and "Power Up Money" appear to be identical:

[MyBonus/Power Up Money] is a bonus credit that can be used for standard calls and texts. [MyBonus/Power Up Money] excludes premium SMS and content, international roaming, Zoo browsing usage charges, Video Calling, 966 and satellite calls.

It's also not clear how this differs from "RevUp Bonus". None of the three labels describe what you actually get, of course.

Second, "Pre-Paid Messaging Money", "Pre-Paid Money" and "FreeCall Minutes" can only be used to contact other Optus mobiles, which isn't quite what their names suggest.

Third, "MyTime" is further restricted to 5 nominated Optus numbers. What this has to do with the words "my" and "time" is anyone's guess. Do other types of credit not involve "time"? That would be awfully generous of them. Or does "MyTime" mean that Optus opens up a personalised pocket of time, just for you, that exists outside the ordinary cosmic flow of events? You'll also notice that "MyTime" comes in both "Minutes" and "Money" versions, for no readily explainable reason.

Finally, a note on the "Money". When you pay $30 under the "TurboCap" offer, Optus tells us that you get $400 "value". Optus clearly doesn't understand the concept of money (or, at least, it doesn't want us to understand). If such service was truly valued at $400, then Optus's accountants would be shredding documents and setting fire to the building. In other words, what you're getting are 400 Optus Dollars (where 1 Optus Dollar = $30/400 = 7.5¢, in this scenario). These come in several entirely non-exchangeable varieties. They cannot be sold, or indeed used for anything except phoning, messaging and downloading 60 kB chunks of data from the Internet (depending on which particular variety of Optus Dollars you happen to have). You don't ever see this "money", because it's just an electronic construct maintained in an Optus database somewhere.

I try to apply Hanlon's Razor - never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence. I'm not sure that incompetence is an adequate explanation.

Tags: ·

Sucks to be me

April 29th, 2009 · Comments Off

After speculating about the stimulus package, and then speculating about whether I'd receive a piece of it, it looks like I've fallen through the cracks. According to Julia Gillard, postgraduate students must be full-time and receiving an APA scholarship, or an equivalent "qualifying" scholarship, in order to be eligible for the $950 Training and Learning Bonus.

Here's why it sucks to be me: I was receiving a scholarship up until November 2007 and then supported myself with tutoring work in 2008. Since I'm not currently receiving a scholarship nor Centrelink payments*, I'm ineligible for the Training and Learning Bonus. On the other hand, because I did receive a scholarship for half the 2007-08 financial year, I didn't earn enough money to pay tax, making me ineligible for the Tax Bonus. Due to the "low income tax offset", my income fell short of the threshold by - wait for it - $30. That's right. One extra hour of tutoring sometime in 2007-08 would have been enough.

Not to worry though, because I've also been wisely investing in shares and managed funds, which (for me) have recently lost 29-74% of their value.

Edit: Alternatively, now I think about it, I could also have avoided claiming a tax deduction for donations to charity. Pay less to Amnesty International and you too could receive a $900 bonus!

* I've never received nor applied for any form of Centrelink assistance.

Tags:

Unstimulated

April 14th, 2009 · 1 Comment

The ATO's tax bonus eligibility calculator informs me that I'm not, after all, eligible to receive the $900 tax bonus. I was above the tax-free threshold in 2007-08, but my tax was erased by offsets. It's not clear whether I'm eligible to receive the $950 "training and learning" bonus either. I'm unknown to Centrelink and I'm not receiving a scholarship, but the Council for Australian Postgraduate Associations is apparently "confident that administrative measures included in the package will mean that no other students are left out."

Jolly good then. I have no idea what these "administrative measures" are, but I'm sure I'll find out eventually, for better or worse.

On a philosophical note, it's tough to decide whether I should be upset (hypothetically) about not being stimulated. We would rightfully complain if the needy were to miss out on welfare. In general, it's natural to complain about not being afforded the same benefits as those around us. However, this isn't really about wealth redistribution - it's just a mechanism to get money circulating again - a once-off event. It's also not as if I'm going to be any worse off, whatever the outcome. However, that 75kg of chocolate may have to wait.

Tags: · , , ,

I jinxed the weather

March 23rd, 2009 · Comments Off

Last Friday I declared to those sitting around me at lunch that Summer was over. It usually is over by mid-March, and (for a time) temperatures seemed to drop in a firm and unambiguous manner.

And now, suddenly, the BoM is forecasting a run of at least four 35-36° days in a row. Grumble, grumble...

Tags: ·

Ash Saturday

February 8th, 2009 · 2 Comments

The fires burning in Victoria are now considered worse than those of Ash Wednesday (16 February 1983). I don't have any particular personal connection to it, but it seems remiss to leave this event unmarked.

Meanwhile, fires are also burning in New South Wales, and the floods continue unabated in Queensland. Perth isn't such a bad place to be, it would seem.

Tags: · ,